This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: <addr_expr <realpart_expr <x>>> ?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:47:17AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> No, it is standard.
>
> [#13] Each complex type has the same representation and
> alignment requirements as an array type containing exactly
> two elements of the corresponding real type; the first
> element is equal to the real part, and the second element to
> the imaginary part, of the complex number.
Well, whatever. Anyway, it's still irrelevant because taking
the address of a variable will also cause it not to be SSA renamed.
r~