This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] [PR optimization/13567] Don't cse no-conflict block

From: kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: wilson at specifixinc dot com
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:31:48 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] [PR optimization/13567] Don't cse no-conflict block
References: <20040108.114731.126784697.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp><1073550069.1026.53.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org><20040108.200455.48509499.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>

kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> If it looks OK, I'll test it with bootstrap and regression tests.

This patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg00559.html)
bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu and sh-linux with no new regressions.

Regards,
	kaz

References:
- [PATCH/RFC] [PR optimization/13567] Don't cse no-conflict block
  - From: kaz Kojima
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] [PR optimization/13567] Don't cse no-conflict block
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] [PR optimization/13567] Don't cse no-conflict block
  - From: kaz Kojima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]