This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New bootstrap failure on ARM systems


> > 
> > > > stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/work/rearnsha/gnu/testinstall/arm-netbsdelf/bin/ 
> > > > -c   -O2 -g -mcpu=strongarm -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings 
> > > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long 
> > > > -Wold-style-definition -Werror    -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE    -I. 
> > > > -I. -I/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc -I/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/. 
> > > > -I/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/../include -I../intl print-rtl1.c -o 
> > > > print-rtl1.o
> > > > print-rtl1.c: In function `print_rtx':
> > > > print-rtl1.c:616: internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start, 
> > > > at flow.c:546
> > > 
> > > Hmm, that sounds like problem with conditional execution and
> > > bbreordering.  This may be the reason why things were ordered the other
> > > way around than it would be natural.  Do you have some kind of testcase?
> > > 
> 
> Is this going to be fixed soon, or would you rather that I reverted the 
> patch?  It's been impossible to bootstrap the trunk on ARM for nearly a 
> week now, which at this stage the development process really isn't an 
> acceptable situation.

oops, sorry, I found your testcase in the archives, somehow it didn't
get to my primary inbox.
I will look into it tomorrow (today I am teaching till 22:00). Sorry for
the delay.

Honza
> 
> R.
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]