This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [lno] fix division by zero
On Jan 4, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Andreas Jaeger <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Diego Novillo <email@example.com> writes:
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 10:53, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Yeah, i'm considering adding TDF_debug to go along with TDF_details
andBut why? TDF_details already means "every stinking detail". Unless
want to have degrees of detail which I'm not sure is worth it.
Ok, I'll use TDF_DETAILS - and we can always change it later-on if
After looking further into all this and noticing that all the debug
information is using fprintf (stderr,...) etc., I fear this would
involve changing everything to output debug information to the dump
file and I'm not willing to do this without further discussion.
If we want an option TDF_DEBUG to do this, I can do that complete
change - but otherwise I suggest that somebody else makes just the
small changes so that only the relevant information is printed out
(instead of to stderr) instead of a complete switch-over.
Debugging information isn't really a "detail". It's things that
developers want to see, but users generally don't. I expect TDF_details
to tell me *why* things happened. Like why we didn't vectorize
something. I expect TDF_stats to tell me how much of something we did.
Debugging information doesn't really fit into either category. Thus,
my TDF_debug suggestion.