This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patches summary

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 30 Dec 2003 16:41:25 -0800
Subject: Re: Patches summary
References: <20031213164232.GM3631@kam.mff.cuni.cz><3FE6AA90.6090509@specifixinc.com> <20031222103703.GJ17542@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 02:37, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg01884.html
> > >    Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
> The idea currently is that -O2 shall be more or less ballanced option
> (not optimizing only for speed at any cost - that would mean for

OK.

Your explanations make sense.  Particularly the part about doing some
code duplication to eliminate possible slowdowns caused by
cross-jumping.  That is a point I missed.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- Patches summary
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Patches summary
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Patches summary
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]