This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed patches
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:51:53 -0800
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches
- References: <200312141925.hBEJPK009452@heute.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Joern Rennecke <amylaar@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg02022.html
>
> 2003-11-25 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
>
> * loop.c (loop_invariant_p): Amend comment about where new registers
> might come from.
OK.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg01299.html
>
> 2003-09-02 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
>
> * reload.c (reg_overlap_mentioned_for_reload_p):
> When looking at a PLUS in X, avoid spuriously returning nonzero
> when IN is a REG or another simple PLUS, or a MEM containing one.
>
> See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg01912.html
> why the fixed bug is a regression.
This is also OK. Thank you for the detailed explanation of the
change. (Should you handle MINUS as well as PLUS this way?)
zw