This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Dec 2003 18:00:12 -0500
Subject: Re: RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304
References: <20031204190927.22555.qmail@gossamer.airs.com><200312041942.hB4JgVN2009222@greed.delorie.com><m3k75cz7h9.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><200312041956.hB4JucDv010724@greed.delorie.com><87ad68434l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> Thread-safety is important, but I'd assume the demangler won't have
> problems here.

It shouldn't.

> License is a potential issue, libgcj has a libgcc-like license.

Same with the demangler.  It looks OK to me--take a look at
libiberty/cp-demangle.c.

Ian

References:
- RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFA: More demangler patches, with fixes for gcc/13244 and gcc/13304
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]