This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:05:00 -0800
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
- References: <xypbrqpgkk1.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com> <200312042057.hB4KvXLU024899@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
> >There's no need for different meanings at different times; we could just
> >allow labels in the arms of COND_EXPR at all times, and say that the goto
> >is implied.
No.
dest = test ? &&L1 : &&L2
r~