This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Put CFG into GGC memory
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:34, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2003 16:27, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >
> > - I am changing the use/def/vuse/vdef operands in stmts to not be
> > varray's any more.
>
> Good. That was on my wish list.
>
> > They'll either use their own little manager, or maybe
> > ggc if they can get their own page and/or a ggc_free maintained list.
>
> They can get their own zone. Is that good enough?
>
Depends on how well ggc_free works. THey tend to be freed and alloced a
lot, and there tends to be a lot of 1 and 2 word hunks. What the minimal
size ggc will actually allocate? it must be at least 2 words?
It will be simple enough to experiment with, but I it might be
sufficient.
Andrew