This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Don't lose asm sets of frame pointer

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:07:38 +1030
Subject: Re: Don't lose asm sets of frame pointer
References: <20031124151951.GA2521@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200311250906.38399.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:09:35AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Just two little questions: is this a regression on the 3.3 branch?

I doubt it.  gcc-2.95 has similar code in global_alloc, and the same
ppc hack that puts r30 in ELIMINABLE_REGS.

> Do you plan to put the fix there?

If given half a chance.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- Don't lose asm sets of frame pointer
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Don't lose asm sets of frame pointer
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]