This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] must-alias fixes...

> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:52:22AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > We can construct such a complex referenced via folding (they are valid
> > gimple operands) and we can promote them into PHI nodes during constant
> > propagation.
> 
> Nops aren't propaged.  How is that getting inside a PLUS?

Perhaps the NOPS are no longer needed after your changes, but the
situation I got was:
(plus_expr (nop_expr (addr_expr symbol)) (const_int val))
Does your changes imply that the NOPs never get inside PLUS?

Honza
> 
> 
> r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]