This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: "Bernardo Innocenti" <bernie at develer dot com>,"Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,"GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:02:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
References: <3FB68E4E.6060308@develer.com> <200311162229.28671.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <012c01c3ac97$57b64cb0$c0ba2997@bagio>

> Yeah, "hum" is the right word here. Do all those regressions show up with
> ONLY my patch applied to mainline?

I just reverted Bernardo's reverting patch and ran the C++ testsuite: the 
hundreds of failures didn't show up.  Weird.  I was away this week-end so 
everything was automated; on Saturday morning hundreds of C++ failures, on 
Sunday morning they were gone.

Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti

References:
- [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]