This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap Failure on x86-Linux With "-pipe"
- From: "Ranjit Mathew" <rmathew at hotmail dot com>
- To: aph at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:59:51 +0530
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap Failure on x86-Linux With "-pipe"
- Bcc:
Sorry Andrew, after much digging I find that your
patch indeed is the right solution till such a time
that we decide what to do about
main_input_filename:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg01247.html
It not only fixes the "-pipe" bootstrap issue,
but also fixes the immediate ICE on invoking
cc1, etc. without an input filename (PR11581).
Thank you.
Ranjit.
2003-10-22 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
* toplev.c (output_file_directive): Allow for null input_name.
Brings "-pipe" back to bootstrap, committed as obvious.
This didn't make it to the current snapshot...
Still, I think this is just hiding the problem.
main_input_filename continues to remain NULL,
though the fact doesn't seem to manifest itself
anywhere else if your bootstrap with "-pipe"
succeeded.
The real problem seems to be something else
as I note in the fourth paragraph of this message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg01220.html
Why is the output filename given to "-o"
eaten up on the specs expanding machinery
in the presence of "-pipe"?
Ranjit.
_________________________________________________________________
He's the fastest Indian.He's Narain Karthikeyan.
http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/tataracing/index.asp Will he make it to F1?