This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] PR 12389
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:06:33PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > /* Verify that inline function never actually inlined has no abstract DIE. */
> > > /* { dg-do compile */
> > > /* { dg-options "-O2 -gdwarf2 -dA" } */
> > > /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "DW_AT_inline" } } */
> > > inline int t()
> > > {
> > > }
> > > int (*q)()=t;
> >
> > Yes, though I'm not sure we actually want to test most of these things; we
> > might change our minds about what the right behavior is.
>
> I think it would be usefull to keep these tests around just to ensure
> that we don't output abstract DIEs when they are not referenced at all.
> Or is tehre some good reason to do so?
Why should this not output abstract DIEs?
I'd think that it should, because you specify 'inline' there.
This should always result in a DW_AT_inline with value DW_INL_declared_not_inlined
don't you think?
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>