Re: Ping rtlopt merge patches

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>]

> All of these are from February (before Phase 2) and received no 
> comments except
> for one but the problem was fixed (was a doc problem).
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00467.html
> rtlopt merge part 6 - tiny regrename improvement
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg02336.html
> rtlopt-branch merge - variable tracking pass - part 2
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg02280.html
> rtlopt-branch merge - variable tracking pass - part 1
> (already pinged today: 
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg00722.html> but good to 
> ping again.)
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00501.html
> rtlopt merge part 8 - webizer pass
> (should really help SPEC on PPC) (had the doc problem).

The documentation bits are at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00540.html
I would really like to see this one in as it deals with performance
regression we introduced by replacing old loop unroller.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01537.html
> rtlopt merge part 11 - trace selection in sched_ebb
> 
> From January:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg01952.html
> rtlopt merge part 3 - CFG update for EBB scheduling

This patch went in in another incarnation of it.

Abother the other patches of mine (all except for variable tracking).  I
think they still should work for mainline, but I can send updated
versions if needed.

Thanks,
Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski