This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Introduce top level bootstrap as a technology preview :-)


"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
| 
| > Currently, if I want to build only a C++ compiler, then not only do
| > have to pay for the C++ compiler, but also I have to pay for a C
| > compiler I'd have moderate interest in.
| >
| > However if we have a C++ compiler buildable in stage1, then I could
| > get a C++ compiler in stage1.  
| 
| As Jason pointed out, you can just do "make" in the gcc directory (or
| "make g++ cc1plus" for even less unwanted stuff).

"make g++ cc1plus" in the gcc directory does not work.  Apparently
missing libiberty stuff.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]