This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] warnings for -Winline

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:52:34 +0200
Subject: Re: [C++ patch] warnings for -Winline
References: <20030909184629.GI24264@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <wvlk78hoijd.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>

> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:46:29 +0200, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> > Any idea why we prohibit inlining for functions that need instantiating?
> > It produces crazy warnins and removing the test appears to cause no harm.
> 
> We don't.  The test you remove in the patch is to avoid instantiating a
> function if we don't expect it to be inlinable anyway, to save compilation
> time.
OK, Should I keep it and add some kind of warning?  What would the
warning say?

Honza
> 
> Jason

References:
- [C++ patch] warnings for -Winline
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [C++ patch] warnings for -Winline
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]