This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's

From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:50:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's
References: <20030825213544.GA19112@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200308252139.h7PLcxSY029292@speedy.slc.redhat.com>

Hello,

> make it instead be stack_alloc (z, &x)) and I think this problem goes
> away.

this might work.  My original problem was partially caused by fact that
I did not want stack_alloc to be considered function :-(. Still I
somewhat doubt that it is really a good idea, but I will give it a try.

Zdenek

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's
  - From: law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]