This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [WWW] simtest-howto.html clarifications, additions
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Dan Kegel <dkegel at ixiacom dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:25:45 -0700
- Subject: Re: [WWW] simtest-howto.html clarifications, additions
- References: <20030611144907.A28171@us.ibm.com> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0306171406280.54535-100000@dair.pair.com>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:16:55PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:22:24PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > Are there other simulators, or are these it?
> >
> > I don't know, and it looks like some of these are broken. I'm also not
> > sure how to build these apart from the support in gdb; when I try to
> > build for fr30-elf, i960-coff, and m32r-elf I get a message that gdb
> > does not support the target, but it might be possible to build only
> > what's needed for the simulator.
>
> Oh. I have a patch to toplev/configure.in that makes it not try
> and compile gdb for m32r-elf (adds gdb to noconfigdirs), which
> I'll apply as obvious.
Please let me know when that's in and I'll try it again. If the other
simulators are no longer supported I'll remove those targets from the
document.
> > 5. builds for v850-elf and mn10300-elf fail building the simulator,
> > although I noticed today that mn10300-elf is now obsolete
>
> Um, no it isn't. It's mn10200-* that's obsolete, gcc-wise.
> (Sorry I didn't spot this the first time I read this.)
Oops, I removed that comment.
> brgds, H-P
> PS. I'm a week behind on the gcc lists.
There's no hurry in getting this all documented. Once things are
working smoothly I hope to verify occasionally that it all still
works, and encourage other people to use it to expand their testing.
Janis