This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Don't return but abort() in tree-ssa-ccp on non-GIMPLE with checking enabled
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:14:57 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Don't return but abort() in tree-ssa-ccp on non-GIMPLE with checking enabled
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1055775713.3322.64.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo w
rites:
>On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:31, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> Bootstrapped C/C++ on i686-pc-cygwin. Not really obvious because I
>> don't know the history of
>> this check, so... OK?
>>
>Yes, but the check was not needed anyway. It's a remnant from old
>code. Statements that are not in GIMPLE form will not have any real
>operands for CCP to deal with. I will be committing a couple of
>modifications to CCP that get rid of this testing altogether.
Thanks for clarifying the current state of the world. Consider my
concerns regarding asms and backend builtins a non-issue.
jeff