This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Split gcc.dg/builtins-20.c
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:41:58 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split gcc.dg/builtins-20.c
Hi Andrew,
> I would split it up even further moving out *l of the *f tests.
> Then I would xfails on non linux, not just execute it only on linux.
I'm not sure whether "dg-do link" tests in the gcc.dg framework
support x-fail? There are currently no examples of "dg-do" being
qualified with anything other than target.
>From the middle-end's perspective, there's no point in splitting the
*f from *l. There's currently only a single backend macro controlling
whether these functions are present, TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS. However,
it would be simple to change this to two: TARGET_C99F_FUNCTIONS and
TARGET_C99L_FUNCTIONS, if you know of a platform that supports one set
and not the other? Darwin?
Roger
--