This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, Tim Josling <tej at melbpc dot org dot au>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:37:36 +0100
- Subject: Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
- References: <3EE4F737.30905@student.tudelft.nl><Pine.LNX.4.44.0306091714210.14066-100000@ops2.one-point.com>
Jeff Sturm writes:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > The front ends that do not build functions as trees right now are:
> > - G77, which is obsolete. Nobody has shown interest in even trying to
> > make it build functions as trees AFAIK. Scheduled for removal once G95
> > has proven itself.
> > - Ada, for which work to make it build functions as trees has been
> > announced a few times (but nothing so far, fingers crossed... ;-)
> > - Treelang...
>
> - And the Java bytecode frontend. (Gcj is two frontends in one, a source
> parser and a bytecode reader.)
Yes. My current plan is to convert the gcj byte compiler as part of
converting java to tree-ssa. If that's going to be too late in the
release cycle I guess my plan needs to change.
Andrew.