Re: [Janitor] Cleanup in f77

[Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>]

Zack Weinberg wrote:

> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>
> > I removed the undefined FFEBLD_BLANK_, FFETARGET_isENFORCED_MAIN_NAME
> > and FFECOM_itemHOOK macros and removed all tests for the
> > FFECOM_...HOOKs which are always defined.  This cleans up the files
> > slightly.
> >
> > The following macros are also not defined anywhere:
> > FFESTD_F90
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER2
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER3
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER4
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER5
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER6
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER7
> > FFETARGET_okCHARACTER8
> > FFETARGET_okCOMPLEX4
> > FFETARGET_okCOMPLEX5
> > FFETARGET_okCOMPLEX6
> > FFETARGET_okCOMPLEX7
> > FFETARGET_okCOMPLEX8
> > FFETARGET_okINTEGER5
> > FFETARGET_okINTEGER6
> > FFETARGET_okINTEGER7
> > FFETARGET_okINTEGER8
> > FFETARGET_okLOGICAL5
> > FFETARGET_okLOGICAL6
> > FFETARGET_okLOGICAL7
> > FFETARGET_okLOGICAL8
> > FFETARGET_okREAL4
> > FFETARGET_okREAL5
> > FFETARGET_okREAL6
> > FFETARGET_okREAL7
> > FFETARGET_okREAL8
> >
> > Should we remove them also?
>
>
> I will let Toon make the final decision about both the patch and the
> removal of these additional macros, but my vote is that they should
> all go away.

It's fine with me.

Thanks !

--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)