This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed patches
- From: Michael Hayes <m dot hayes at elec dot canterbury dot ac dot nz>
- To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 13:19:42 +1200
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches
- References: <20030530130805.GA24887@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Zdenek Dvorak writes:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg01542.html
It seems like this patch foundered since the speedup required further
substantiating. Do you have any further measurements to support your
claims for this patch?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg01569.html
Again this patch foundered due to the impasse between the original
author and yourself and the lack of a maintainer to moderate. More
supporting evidence would have helped. May I suggest that we
enapsulate the fibonacci heap and simple heap implementations behind a
generic heap interface. We could then select the best implementation
at run-time.
Michael.