This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Janitor] ISO C90 prototypes for toplev.*
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:27:24 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: [Janitor] ISO C90 prototypes for toplev.*
- References: <u8wug6vteh.fsf@gromit.moeb>
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> +extern void reg_alloc (void);
> +extern int toplev_main (int, char **);
Can we work out which of these two styles we are going to use (a single
space - my preference - or aligning multiple prototypes)? This patch just
follows the inconsistent styles used with PARAMS, but the C90 conversion
is an ideal time to make this consistent. (I know the style has been
disputed in the past <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1997-09/msg00825.html>
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1997-09/msg00868.html> etc. - but now we're
removing the PARAMS I think we should go for (and document) a consistent
style.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk