This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Updated --with-cpu patches...
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 May 2003 16:13:35 -0300
- Subject: Re: Updated --with-cpu patches...
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20030520010054.GA523@doctormoo><20030520035029.GA11304@nevyn.them.org>
On May 20, 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:00:54PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> As long as you're poking huge amounts of the code anyway, how about
>> making the indentation reasonable in the parts you're poking?... I was
>> told not to because large diffs make branch merges hard. But with large
>> diffs anyway...
> Well, tabs are what was there, but I've got no preference. Anyone
> else? Otherwise I can just down it to two spaces if/when I check it in.
I'd rather not have changed indentation along with code changes in the
same check in. However, as Nathan says, since a lot of code is
changing anyway, merges will be difficult, so this would be a good
time to get the indentation changes Nathan wants to make. So how
about checking Dan's patch as-is, immediately followed by Nathan's
indentation changes?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer