This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: small varasm.c improvements
> From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
>
> The mips-irix failure is spurious; the regexp in const-elim-1.c
> matches things it shouldn't (.LCFIn labels). Could you please try the
> appended patch for that?
> zw
>
> * gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: Tighten scan-assembler-not regexp.
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c99" } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "LC" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "LC\[0-9\]" } } */
>
> #define I (__extension__ 1.0iF)
Looks like you checked in a variant of your patch which adds '[^A-Z]'
rather than '[0-9]'. My builds on irix6 from last night no longer
have an error in const-elim-1.c so it seems to have worked. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-05/msg00871.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-05/msg00870.html
PS: what's the consensus on the dejagnu/expect/tcl tarball in the
infrastructure directory?
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu