This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Updated --with-cpu patch, v9
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, zack at codesourcery dot com
- Date: 13 May 2003 19:39:55 -0300
- Subject: Re: Updated --with-cpu patch, v9
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20030512225727.GA19286@nevyn.them.org>
Neat! Just one thing I dislike about it:
On May 12, 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:
> +to apply if a default with this name was specified. The string @samp{VALUE}
> +in the spec will be replaced by the value of the default everywhere it
> +occurs.
I'd rather have some special spec for this (%(VALUE) or so, instead of
using a fixed string that might be legitimately used in specs). But
then, why not go ahead and define the defaults as separate specs
(%(default_cpu_spec), %(default_tune_spec)) etc, and rely on
DRIVER_SELF_SPECS alone?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer