This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] use symbol_ref flags for rs6000

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:34:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] use symbol_ref flags for rs6000

The problem is that darwin_encode_section_info does not call default_encode_section_info or set the flag SYMBOL_FLAG_FUNCTION. either this patch which just set the SYMBOL_FLAG_FUNCTION for the sym_ref or call default_encode_section_info.

ChangeLog:

2003-04-30 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> * config/darwin.c (darwin_encode_section_info) set SYMBOL_FLAG_FUNCTION if sym_ref is a function.

Attachment: temp.diff
Description: Binary data


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Wednesday, Apr 30, 2003, at 19:10 US/Eastern, Stan Shebs wrote:

David Edelsohn wrote:
Janis Johnson writes:

Janis> Should I remove the assertion that is failing for Darwin, or revert Janis> the patch, or will there be a fix to Darwin soon that sets the flags?
	Stan and I have a handle on the problem and a proposed fix.  He'll
commit the patch once he does some more testing.
Alas, I was mistaken when I thought it was working - was looking at
the wrong build.  But I'm now sitting in GDB poking at it, and
as we know no problem can resist the power of GDB for long. :-)
Stan

References:
- Re: [RFC] use symbol_ref flags for rs6000
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]