This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do more sanity-checking in unwind-dw2-fde.c

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Douglas B Rupp <rupp at gnat dot com>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:37:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Do more sanity-checking in unwind-dw2-fde.c
References: <10304182248.AA20436@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20030421235707.GC23370@redhat.com> <005901c3093c$712231e0$6901a8c0@Jinx>

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:02:32PM -0700, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
> If the .eh_frame section is empty...

Why would it be empty?

/* Terminate the frame unwind info section with a 4byte 0 as a sentinel;
   this would be the 'length' field in a real FDE.  */
STATIC EH_FRAME_SECTION_CONST int __FRAME_END__[]
     __attribute__ ((unused, mode(SI), section(EH_FRAME_SECTION_NAME),
                     aligned(4)))
     = { 0 };


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do more sanity-checking in unwind-dw2-fde.c
  - From: Douglas B Rupp

References:
- Do more sanity-checking in unwind-dw2-fde.c
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Do more sanity-checking in unwind-dw2-fde.c
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Do more sanity-checking in unwind-dw2-fde.c
  - From: Douglas B Rupp

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]