This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] nreverse

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:01:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nreverse
References: <870A48DA-6F78-11D7-B33F-0003935AAA26@apple.com> <1050435292.15103.59.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <20030416003010.GD12355@redhat.com> <1050460889.15103.69.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:41:28PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> We can do that, but then when using a compiler that doesn't support
> inline, you'll pay two function calls instead of one.

Yep, but we shouldn't particularly care about the stage1 compiler.
Just so long as it works...


r~

References:
- [PATCH] nreverse
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [PATCH] nreverse
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] nreverse
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] nreverse
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]