This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] C++ vs forced unwinding
- From: <tm_gccmail at mail dot kloo dot net>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, jason at redhat dot com,mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:56:44 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [RFC] C++ vs forced unwinding
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Really, I think it's about time to revisit re-enabling unwind
> tables by default in C. The overhead when using current
> binutils and glibc has dropped to just about zero.
>
>
> r~
Space or time overhead, or both?
Toshi