This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC:] Support FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASS (through FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES)
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com, tm_gccmail at mail dot kloo dot net, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 04:14:23 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC:] Support FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASS (through FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES)
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:36:45 -0800
> From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:34:59PM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Other than what? GENERAL_REGS? If so, no.
> > Why must it be excluded from GENERAL_REGS?
>
> No, you're confused. You add it to NON_INC_DEC_CLASS, a
> strict subset of GENERAL_REGS. That register becomes a
> member of it, etc.
Yes, I'm confused, because I think that's what I said.
I'm objecting to what I think Toshi said: that I should
exclude member(s) of NON_INC_DEC_CLASS from GENERAL_REGS.
brgds, H-P