This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Improve i386 add

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:49:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Improve i386 add
References: <20030325223717.GM13314@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20030326053845.GB16097@redhat.com> <20030326102653.GA1690@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20030326165828.GA16377@redhat.com> <20030326221346.GC12348@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:13:46PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> So the sollution using extra splitter to get the usual "add" form of the
> instruction still looks sane.

Double splitting looks sane?  Sounds like wasted time and memory to me.

> Doing it with one extra alternative and
> one extra condition in regnums looks fine to me too.

Please.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Improve i386 add
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Improve i386 add
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Improve i386 add
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Improve i386 add
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Improve i386 add
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Improve i386 add
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Improve i386 add
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]