This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: rs6000 SPE breakage
> cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:27:21 -0500
> From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2003 02:27:23.0679 (UTC) FILETIME=[699152F0:01C2EA9A]
>
> >>>>> Geoff Keating writes:
>
> > Yes, something like this patch is required. Why would htab_traverse
> > ever need to allocate memory? It does not change the hash table.
>
> Not compacting in htab_traverse or not compating when
> htab_traverse is called from ggc-common?
The second is a requirement, but I'm wondering why we don't do the first.
> I think Honza is testing the size during htab_traverse because it
> is called frequently.
Lots of things are called frequently but they don't all change the
size of hash tables...
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>