This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald at landheer dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 21:33:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302191611130.24069-100000@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Ronald" == Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald at landheer dot com> writes:
Ronald> NB: should I file PRs for the other two "problems" I
Ronald> encountered during compile as well (ffitest not being compiled
Ronald> and the headers being "fixed" incorrectly) or is that not
Ronald> necessary? I can problably whip up a patch to the header
Ronald> fixing config file, and the Makefile.in file for the
Ronald> ffitest-failure (shouldn't be too much of a problem).
In theory ffitest should only be built during `make check'.
I don't know about the header-fixing bug. I don't remember reading
about that.
Tom