This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch] QNX i386 native support take 2
- From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken at qnx dot com>
- To: "Mark Kettenis" <kettenis at chello dot nl>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:41:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: [Patch] QNX i386 native support take 2
- References: <067a01c2d6c7$092d87d0$0202040a@catdog> <86lm06oaf9.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
Status report:
> * You should submit BFD changes to the binutils list.
Submitted, approved and applied.
> * You should submit config.sub changes to the appropriate list (see
> MAINTAINERS at toplevel).
Submitted to config-patches at gnu dot org
> * I think this patch can be broken up in some smaller bits that can be
> approved more easily, e.g. the osabi stuff.
Patch submitted. Approval pending.
> * I'd really prefer if we could move the bits in the *-tdep.c files
> dealing with the NTO remote protocol to seperate files.
I've cleaned this up. There were a couple defines/enums that needed to be
moved to nto-share/debug.h from nto-share/dsmsgs.h. Now there is no
requirement for the remote header in any of the tdep stuff.
Note also that I've cleaned a few more things up, including copyright
headers on all files, etc.
> I've been hacking on a (minimal) i386-nto-tdep.c file based on your
> patches. If it's OK, I'd like to get that in first such that we can
> work from there. That gets the basic support "in". We can then
> discuss the hairier bits later.
Perhaps that combined with my changes will do the trick.
Kris