This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmarakov at redhat dot com, edelson at gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:48:33 +0100
Subject: Re: CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling
References: <20030207115639.GK18788@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20030219125332.GA21285@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030219174038.GB27772@redhat.com>

> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:53:32PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > We've chatted briefly about this.  Should I change it to move
> > reorder_basic_block pass in front of sched2 pass and re-do
> > reordering only in case we did eigher some cleanup_cfg or reg-stack
> > conversion?
> 
> Please do.  I don't know if just cleanup_cfg warrents rerunning
> bb-reorder, but certainly reg-stack would.
In case we happen to do crossjumping, it does.

Honza
> 
> 
> 
> r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]