This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald at landheer dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Feb 2003 09:30:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302141540020.17397-200000@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Ronald" == Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald@landheer.com> writes:
Ronald> I have attached a (very, very) small patch to
Ronald> libjava/java/lang/natPosixProcess.cc which fixes a bug -
Ronald> kill() is called from java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
Ronald> even when no signals are available. This will make the
Ronald> compilation fail if there are no signals.
What defines NO_SIGNALS? And when?
Tom