This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 12:58 PM, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Mike Stump wrote:Ping. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00377.html- Please submit unrelated varray changes separately.
Done. Approved and in.
- You changed the include list in ggc-page.c but not Makefile.in
Done.
- The varray stuff in ggc-page.c seems excessive for such a limited use.Sure. Done. Now, we get to the hard question. If the check for the definition of __builtin_prefetch correct? If not, this will introduce a dependancy on a recent gcc, bad.
Couldn't you just use xmalloc and xrealloc and a simple variable-length
array?
Attachment:
popcontext-fsf-3.diffs
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |