This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2

From: Marc Espie <espie at nerim dot net>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:46:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2
References: <20030212123218.GA29961@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr> <m3znp1mzb5.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <Pine.BSF.4.51.0302121656180.25108@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.BSF.4.51.0302121712470.25108@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20030212162050.GA10094@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr> <Pine.BSF.4.51.0302121721500.25108@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-to: espie at nerim dot net

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 05:22:45PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Look, I don't care where it comes from. This is a simple patch, it's
> > on mainline already, it's needed in 3.2.2. I just want an okay to check
> > it in on 3.3/3.4, it it's needed. No need for excessive paperwork, is there ?
> 
> Apart from the confusion I created :-}, please note that I tried to make
> the situation _simpler_ in that instead of Mark _any_ global write or
> Makefile maintainer can approve the patch.
> 
> Certainly no paperwork involved.

No matter, the gcc-3.3 branch point occurred after the relevant commit,
so everything is fine...

References:
- [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [PATCH] DESTDIR issue in 3.2.2
  - From: Marc Espie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]