This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Geoff Keating wrote:
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:| CVSROOT: /cvs/gccTrue. You said that it was approved modulo some changes which turn out to be wrong.
| Module name: gcc
| Changes by: neroden@gcc.gnu.org 2003-01-24 00:45:55
| | Modified files:
| gcc/cp : ChangeLog dump.c | | Log message:
| * dump.c: ANSIfy function declarations and definitions.
This patch wasn't approved at such.
-- Gaby
That is, "not approved".In actual fact, I consider it obviously correct,Any patch that gets disapproved is never obviously correct. Please
"Disapproved" is not the same as "not approved".
All right, but it is obviously correct. I only submitted it out of politeness and conservatism; I'll be sure not to submit before committing patches I consider obvious next time. You do realize that's what you just told me to do?don't do it again.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |