This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Overhaul __builtin_constant_p processing (take 2)

From: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at www dot eyesopen dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:09:16 +1100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Overhaul __builtin_constant_p processing (take 2)
References: <20030121182010.GA21571@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301212046080.25301-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

On 21-Jan-2003, Roger Sayle <roger@www.eyesopen.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hmm.  Ok, one last question: what impact does this have on
> > compile times?
...
> There's a reproduceable slow down of ... 0.87%

At what optimization level?

What is the effect at other optimization levels?

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Overhaul __builtin_constant_p processing (take 2)
  - From: Roger Sayle

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Overhaul __builtin_constant_p processing
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [PATCH] Overhaul __builtin_constant_p processing (take 2)
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]