This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch: Enforce -Werror during bootstrap


 > From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
 > 
 > "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
 > 
 > > Anyway, we're left with a handful of warnings, Some of which one could
 > > fix and maybe one which might require a bypass (modulo the missing
 > > ones I couldn't see.)
 > >
 > > I hardly think this proves your point.  In fact, I think it proves
 > > mine, i.e. that it's doable.  We're millimeters away from success.  If
 > > you and perhaps others would help we can cross the goal line.
 > 
 > I am all for fixing the warnings.  I just think that the emphasis
 > should be on *fixing the warnings*; I think -Werror is a distraction.
 > [...]
 > zw

Dude, no one has fixed more warnings than me.  What I find distracting
and discouraging is seeing warning regressions is files that were
previously clean.  Using -Werror has been requested by several people
who can't seem to stop themselves from introducing new ones.
I.e. Somebody shoot me before I code again! :-)

Anyway, I'm running cross-compiles to all the primary and secondary
systems right now.  I'm going to ensure they build cc1, xgcc, etc
before I propose installing the -Werror patch.

		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]