This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Java: fixes for -fno-assume-compiled
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 19 Dec 2002 18:35:44 -0700
- Subject: Re: Java: fixes for -fno-assume-compiled
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212191702450.6051-100000@ops2.one-point.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
>> Could we add a flag somewhere instead?
Jeff> Where? I don't think accflags is the right place.
Ok.
Jeff> Is there really much danger of a valid pointer that looks like a
Jeff> valid constant pool index, i.e. smaller than pool->size?
I think there is zero danger.
The runtime side is ok once the unsigned change and Andrew's point
(about integer type size) is addressed.
Tom