This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] doc/*.texi: Fix typos and follow spelling conventions.
- From: Ziemowit Laski <zlaski at apple dot com>
- To: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:40:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch] doc/*.texi: Fix typos and follow spelling conventions.
Joseph, I hate to be a gadfly, but can you explain the rationale here?
Is there an ISO standard somewhere stipulating that incomplete and/or
incorrect documentation must also be misspelled, or that two wrongs
make a right?
--Zem
On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 11:59 US/Pacific, Kazu Hirata wrote:
Hi Joseph,
The spellings here are deliberate.
Should I revert that part?
Yes.
Done.
Kazu Hirata
2002-12-17 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
* doc/c-tree.texi: Restore deliberate spelling mistakes.
Index: c-tree.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/doc/c-tree.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.38 c-tree.texi
--- c-tree.texi 17 Dec 2002 19:52:29 -0000
+++ c-tree.texi 17 Dec 2002 16:47:43 -0000 1.38
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
@node Deficiencies
@section Deficiencies
-There are many places in which this document is incomplet and
incorrekt.
+There are many places in which this document is incomplete and
incorrect.
It is, as of yet, only @emph{preliminary} documentation.
@c
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ziemowit Laski 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group Cupertino, CA USA 95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc. +1.408.974.6229 Fax .5477