This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [basic-improvements] 32x64 proposed fix
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:15:26 -0800
- Subject: Re: [basic-improvements] 32x64 proposed fix
I am testing this patch with another i686-linux bootstrap (all
languages) and an i686-linux -> mips64-elf simulator cross build (C
and C++ only). That will take all night. Assuming success, OK to
apply this patch?
Yes, this approach looks good.
(By the way, I see that we're trying __int64_t, while C99 has int64_t,
on systems where that makes sense. There's no need to change anything
here, but if we run into a system where we need this type that does not
have __int64_t, we may want to look for int64_t instead.)
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com