This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH[b-i=b]: Change cpp_hashnode.directive_index to a bit-field
> > I wonder: Are there actually still any machines that have signed
> > bitfields, supported as gcc hosts?
>
> Yes. This came up in the real.c rewrite as well. I don't
> recall whose bootstrap compiler it was, but you could look
> for the antecedent to
>
> 2002-10-03 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
>
> * real.h (struct real_value): Use ENUM_BITFIELD.
I think that would be OpenServer. It uses signed bitfields (as ISO
allows it to do) AFAIR. I'm not within reach of a tree right now, but
if ENUM_BITFIELD appears in a ChangeLog with my name on it, that would
be the victim^Wreason.
RJL