This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH[b-i=b]: Change cpp_hashnode.directive_index to a bit-field


> > I wonder:  Are there actually still any machines that have signed
> > bitfields, supported as gcc hosts?
> 
> Yes.  This came up in the real.c rewrite as well.  I don't
> recall whose bootstrap compiler it was, but you could look
> for the antecedent to 
> 
> 2002-10-03  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
> 
>         * real.h (struct real_value): Use ENUM_BITFIELD.

I think that would be OpenServer.  It uses signed bitfields (as ISO
allows it to do) AFAIR.   I'm not within reach of a tree right now, but
if ENUM_BITFIELD appears in a ChangeLog with my name on it, that would
be the victim^Wreason.

RJL


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]