This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: darwin specific

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:05:37 -0800
Subject: Re: Patch: darwin specific
References: <87wun14hqt.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <18934CFD-00A9-11D7-A6D6-000393D76DAA@apple.com>

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:07:09AM -0800, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> I should explain this more.  There is a need to keep pointers, 
> potentially two, from one IDENTIFIER node to another ...

I don't believe you really want IDENTIFIER, but rather on
some VAR_DECL or FUNCTION_DECL.

As for the extra pointers... since no other target seems to
need these (at the moment anyway), I would think the best
solution would be to have a hash table indexed by DECL and
which holds a structure that has the information you want.

r~

References:
- Re: Patch: darwin specific
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Patch: darwin specific
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]