This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Toplevel patch: Remove EXTRA_TARGET_HOST hackery
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: dj at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:17:58 -0500
- Subject: Re: Toplevel patch: Remove EXTRA_TARGET_HOST hackery
>> After my outstanding patches, the EXTRA_TARGET_HOST hackery isn't
>needed
>> anymore. The all-libiberty target can be generated
>
>I assume you meant all-termcap.
Blah. Yes, of course I meant all-libtermcap.
>>
>> unconditionally, because the "all" target only depends on it when
>it's
>> being configured, which is exactly when it used to be added;
>similarly
>> with the install-libiberty target.
>
>What about mt-wince's inclusion of all-utils?
Good point. I missed that.
It's added to the list of configured directories always. (!) Think it
would be acceptable to add it to the list of host modules and build it
always? This would be a behavior change in that:
* utils/spu would always build
* utils/sparclite would build for sparclite targets
Those both look like positive changes to me.
--Nathanael